EPA Seeks Comments on Nominations to FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel

EPA is seeking public comments on experts nominated to serve on the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory

View as a webpage / Share Pesticide Update EPA Seeks Comments on Nominations to FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public comments on experts nominated to serve on the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP). The FIFRA SAP provides independent scientific advice, information, and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on pesticides and pesticide related issues. Independent peer review helps ensure pesticide registration decisions are based on sound, unbiased science. Taking public input on potential committee reviewers remains vital to forming a balanced and robust peer review panel. This practice ensures the agency benefits from a wide array of scientific viewpoints and real-world perspectives, supporting review processes that are fair, rigorous, and reflective of the best available science. The FIFRA SAP is composed of a permanent panel of seven scientists appointed by the EPA Administrator to serve staggered terms of three to six years. These experts are appointed from a pool of candidates provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF). In April 2026, EPA requested nominations from NIH and NSF to fill vacancies on the FIFRA SAP due to expiring terms. Specifically, EPA requested nationally recognized experts with expertise in ecological and human exposure assessment, including environmental fate and transport of chemicals, and New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). Experts with specific experience in risk assessment, dose-response analysis, cheminformatics, bioinformatics, and genomics are preferred. NIH and NSF provided the agency with a total of 28 nominees, of which, 16 are interested and available to actively participate in FIFRA SAP meetings. Consistent with this Administration’s commitment to transparency, biographies of the interested and available candidates will be available in docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2026-5679, and through the FIFRA SAP website. Public comments on these experts will be used to assist the agency in appointing two new FIFRA SAP members to fill vacancies by October 2026. All comments must be submitted to the docket within 21 days from the publication of the Federal Register Notice. Prospective candidates for membership on the FIFRA SAP are asked to submit confidential financial information, and fully disclose, among other financial interests, the candidate's employment, stocks and bonds, and where applicable, sources of research support. EPA will evaluate the nominees’ financial disclosure forms to assess whether there are financial conflicts of interest or the appearance of a loss of impartiality. EPA will also review any prior involvement with the development of documents likely to be under consideration by the FIFRA SAP (including previous scientific peer reviews) before a nominee is considered for appointment. EPA will consider public comments on the FIFRA SAP membership candidates and will then release a list of selected candidates after conducting ethics reviews and reviewing technical expertise and public feedback.   For additional information, please see the FIFRA SAP website, or contact Tamue L. Gibson, Designated Federal Officer, at gibson.tamue@epa.gov or 202-564-7642. Learn more about Children's Health and Healthy School Environments.

Stay Connected with EPA Office of the Administrator:         SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help

This email was sent to iswanto.denny.awil@blogger.com using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: EPA Office of the Administrator · 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460

EPA Seeks Nominations for Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee; Agency Reestablishes Committee to Strengthen Stakeholder Input

EPA Seeks Nominations for Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee; Agency Reestablishes Committee to Strengthen Stakeholder Input

View as a webpage / Share Pesticide Update EPA Seeks Nominations for Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee; Agency Reestablishes Committee to Strengthen Stakeholder Input The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is requesting nominations for the Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee (PPDC), a federal advisory committee that advises the EPA Administrator on pesticide policy, science, and program implementation, with a focus on evaluating and reducing the real-world risks that pesticides pose to human health and the environment. Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), EPA is reestablishing the PPDC for a two-year term and scheduling its next meeting. EPA is committed to a committee that is genuinely balanced. Every nominee will be reviewed for conflicts of interest, and EPA will apply FACA's fair-balance requirement so that no single interest dominates the conversation. The work of this committee may focus on questions families are asking like: cumulative and combined exposures, effects on children's development, and how the agency can make its review process more transparent and better communicate the science‑based decisions that protect human health and the environment while supporting a fair and effective pesticide program. EPA is seeking qualified nominees to serve two‑year terms. Consistent with the PPDC charter, nominees will be selected to represent a broad range of perspectives, including: Pesticide industry and trade associations Pesticide users, growers, and commodity groups Federal, state, local, and tribal governments Academia Animal welfare and public health organizations Environmental and public interest organizations Farmworker organizations The general public EPA especially encourages nominations from public-health, children's-health, farmworker, and community organizations to ensure these perspectives are strongly represented. Instructions for submitting nominations will be provided in the Federal Register notice. Upon publication in the Federal Register notice, nominations will be accepted until September 16, 2026. Vacancies are expected to be filled by November 2026. Learn more about Children's Health and Healthy School Environments.

Stay Connected with EPA Office of the Administrator:         SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help

This email was sent to iswanto.denny.awil@blogger.com using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: EPA Office of the Administrator · 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460

EPA Releases Draft TSCA Risk Evaluations for Two Chemicals Found in Household and Commercial Products

EPA Releases Draft TSCA Risk Evaluations for Two Chemicals Found in Household and Commercial Products

View as a webpage / Share News Release EPA Releases Draft TSCA Risk Evaluations for Two Chemicals Found in Household and Commercial Products August 6, 2026 | Contact EPA's Press Office (press@epa.gov) WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is advancing its review of o-dichlorobenzene (oDCB) and p-dichlorobenzene (pDCB) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) by releasing draft risk evaluations for public comment. Both chemicals are found in products used in homes and workplaces and can evaporate into the air. For pDCB, which is used in some air care and deodorizing products, indoor air can be a key exposure route for people who use those products. Evaluating each chemical across its conditions of use and exposure pathways is how EPA determines where new protections may be needed and where existing safeguards are sufficient. EPA applied systematic review and weighed the reasonably available, peer-reviewed science alongside information submitted to the Agency. The complete draft evaluations, technical support documents, and underlying data will be available in the public dockets and on EPA's website. The draft evaluations preliminarily found: oDCB contributes to unreasonable risk to workers from 14 conditions of use (inhalation, with dermal exposure from seven) and to consumers from one condition of use through inhalation. Non-cancer hazards evaluated include developmental, liver, and respiratory toxicity. pDCB contributes to unreasonable risk to workers from 7 conditions of use through inhalation and dermal exposure, and to consumers via inhalation from air care products. Non-cancer hazards evaluated include developmental, liver, and respiratory toxicity. For both chemicals, the draft preliminarily risk evaluations found no unreasonable risk to the general population through ambient outdoor air, including fenceline communities, or to the environment. This is separate from the consumer-use exposures above, where the drafts do identify some conditions of use as contributing to unreasonable risk. Consistent with TSCA, EPA considered potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, including workers and groups that may be more susceptible, in characterizing risk. EPA's draft worker risk estimates do not assume the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) as the basis for the risk determination; the drafts separately discuss how PPE and other controls could reduce exposure. EPA welcomes comments and data on the occupational and consumer exposure scenarios, on potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, and on additional health endpoints. For pDCB, EPA's draft determination is that it is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans, based on a non-mutagenic, threshold-dependent mode of action for the liver tumors observed in animals. EPA recognizes that IARC and the National Toxicology Program have classified pDCB differently and specifically invites comments and data on this evaluation. These are draft findings, and EPA wants feedback. The 60-day comment period is how EPA hears from independent experts, workers, communities, and the public before finalizing the risk evaluations. All current protections and product label directions remain in place while EPA completes these reviews; releasing draft evaluations does not alter any existing safeguard. If EPA continues to find unreasonable risk, it will propose risk-management actions under TSCA section 6(a) to address those exposures. EPA is working toward the February 12, 2027, consent-decree deadline for the final evaluations. Upon publication of the Federal Register notice, EPA will accept comments for 60 days at regulations.gov: oDCB via EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0444 and pDCB via EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0446. Read the Press Release Learn more about Children's Health and Healthy School Environments.

Stay Connected with EPA Office of the Administrator:         SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help

This email was sent to iswanto.denny.awil@blogger.com using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: EPA Office of the Administrator · 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460

Last chance to register for tomorrow’s EPA webinar — From Vision to Action: How School District Leaders Drive Healthy Indoor Air Quality!

Don’t miss tomorrow’s webinar on school indoor air quality!

View as a webpage / Share Don’t miss tomorrow’s webinar on school indoor air quality! From Vision to Action: How School District Leaders Drive Healthy Indoor Air Quality Tomorrow, August 11, 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. ET Register Join the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency tomorrow for an informative session on how school boards, superintendents and district leaders can lead the way by setting policy, aligning budgets and priorities, and institutionalizing practices to integrate indoor air quality (IAQ) management into routine district operations. During the webinar, hear from a panel of school board and district leaders from the 2026 National School Boards Association Magna Awards recognition program as they discuss their efforts to enhance student learning and academic success by improving IAQ: Pamela Boozer-Strother, M.B.A., CAE, Board of Education Member, Prince George’s County Public Schools, Maryland Sandi Brundage, M.S., M.S.Ed., Grant Administrator, Salamanca City Central School District, New York Antaniece Carter, Ed.D., Director of Social Emotional Learning and Health Services, East St. Louis School District 189, Illinois Sydney Stigge-Kaufman, M.S.W., Executive Director of Communications and Strategic Partnerships, East St. Louis School District 189, Illinois Joseph Haskell, M.A., Director of Maintenance, Operations, and Risk Management, East St. Louis School District 189, Illinois Sheila Stevens, Program Manager, Department of Sustainability and Resilience, Prince George’s County Public Schools, Maryland These leaders will share how and why their school boards adopted EPA‑aligned IAQ management plans, linked IAQ with energy efficiency, mobilized cross‑department teams, and used training and simple metrics to drive results and program sustainability — even with ever‑tightening school budgets. The webinar will also highlight how to access and implement cost‑effective best practices and resources, including training, technical assistance and funding. Spread the word! Share this email with colleagues. Learn more about the Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Tools for Schools guidance and access other valuable school environmental health resources at www.epa.gov/iaq-schools. If you have questions about the IAQ Tools for Schools guidance, please contact iaqschools@epa.gov. Learn more about IAQ.

STAY CONNECTED:

---

Questions? Contact Us 

Manage Preferences or Unsubscribe | Help

This email was sent to iswanto.denny.awil@blogger.com using Granicus Communications Cloud on behalf of: EPA Office of Air and Radiation ·1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW · Washington, DC 20460